Peer Review Policies 

Journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process, ensuring objective evaluation with the active involvement of our esteemed editorial team. Comprising senior experts with profound knowledge in their fields, these individuals oversee the journal's content, guaranteeing the highest standards of quality and relevance.

• Our editorial team conducts an initial review of every submitted manuscript, evaluating its timeliness, relevance, scientific merit, clarity, and interest to our readers.

• If deemed suitable, the manuscript is peer-reviewed by experts from our international editorial board or other renowned specialists.

• Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and reputation in their field and are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest.

• Our peer-review process is double-blinded to ensure impartiality.

• A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.

• Revised manuscripts may undergo further peer review.

• The final decision on publication rests with our expert editor-in-chief.

This review process ensures the publication of unbiased, scientifically accurate, and relevant articles.